/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

X Director of Engineering Haofei Wang says “we are making likes private” in an update happening “soon”, as “public likes are incentivizing the wrong behavior”

Gizmodo Maxwell Zeff

Context & Ripple Effects

X had previously explored letting paid users hide Likes, including from its APIs, making this a broader extension of an earlier paid-user privacy option. The rationale now centers on the behavioral effects of making endorsement activity visible.

The proposed change was subsequently described as a platform-wide rollout: users would no longer be able to see who liked another person’s post in the later confirmation of private Likes. That makes the announcement a consequential redesign of X’s social-feedback layer rather than a narrow subscription feature.

First-order effects

  • Users’ Like activity becomes less visible to other users, removing a public record of who endorsed a given post.
  • X changes the incentive around liking: users can signal approval without exposing that choice to their audience, while the platform seeks to reduce behavior shaped by public Like visibility.

Second-order effects

  • Creators, brands, and researchers lose an easily observable audience-affinity signal, making public engagement analysis less granular even if Likes remain part of the product’s internal feedback system.
  • The move expands beyond X’s earlier paid-only approach, reducing one visible distinction between subscriber and non-subscriber privacy controls.

Third-order effects

  • If platforms continue limiting visibility into individual engagement actions, public social graphs may become less useful as a source of reputational signaling and third-party audience intelligence.
  • The change illustrates a broader product-governance trade-off: platforms can moderate socially performative behavior by making feedback more private, but at the cost of public transparency around influence and endorsement.

The trend: This is one data point in the shift from fully public engagement signals toward more platform-controlled, privacy-oriented conversational influence surfaces.

Discussion

  • @wanghaofei @wanghaofei on x
    Yeah, we are making likes private.  Public likes are incentivizing the wrong behavior.  For example, many people feel discouraged from liking content that might be “edgy” in fear of retaliation from trolls, or to protect their public image.  Soon you'll be able to like without wo…
  • @aaronp613 Aaron on x
    X will soon not allow you to see what other accounts like on the iOS app. Here is before and after enabling the flag [image]
  • @xdaily @xdaily on x
    SPECULATION: X *might* be hiding likes for all users by default. [image]
  • @cwarzel Charlie Warzel on x
    honestly kind of sick to watch a tech company build a product for the underserved niche of edgelords who have public personas
  • @carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on x
    They should have gotten rid of this feature a long time ago. At best it's neutral as people rarely look at other's likes. At worst it creates scandals and drama due to liking certain content while discouraging people from liking said content due to drama. https://gizmodo.com/...
  • @jack @jack on x
    @wanghaofei what's the difference between a “like” and a “bookmark” then? “like"/❤️ was originally a ⭐️. we should have never moved away from that.
  • @enriquebrgn Enrique on x
    @jack @wanghaofei The author can see who liked their posts vs they cannot see who bookmarked it Agree on the star, i liked it
  • @wallstreetsilv @wallstreetsilv on x
    @wanghaofei The number of likes visible is a great indicator on whether something is worth reading or watching. I thought X was trying to encourage more engagement. You are taking away the critical signals of engagement and high quality content.
  • @wanghaofei @wanghaofei on x
    @jack Like is visible between you and the author, the author will be notified, but not anyone else. Bookmark is only visible to you. We could make it a ⭐️, or even make it customizable for users.