2025-11-30
@gneubig @pangramlabs I'm afraid this may flag people who are not as fluent in English and just wanted it to help them correct grammar
Nature
Pangram Labs: ~21% of the 75,800 peer reviews submitted for ICLR 2026, a major ML conference, were fully AI-generated, and 50%+ contained signs of AI use
By - Miryam Naddaf 0 — Miryam Naddaf is a science writer based in London. — Search author on: — PubMed Google Scholar
2025-11-29
@gneubig @pangramlabs I'm afraid this may flag people who are not as fluent in English and just wanted it to help them correct grammar
Nature
Pangram Labs: ~21% of the 75,800 peer reviews submitted for ICLR 2026, a major ML conference, were fully AI-generated, and 50%+ contained signs of AI use
By - Miryam Naddaf 0 — Miryam Naddaf is a science writer based in London. — Search author on: — PubMed Google Scholar
2022-11-19
@ylecun Uhmm it was never advertised as something to have fun with, but as an actual helper to write scientific papers, task for which it sucked
MIT Technology Review
Meta AI and Papers with Code pull Galactica three days after launch, amid criticism the large language model for generating scientific text asserts falsehoods
and its hubris—show once again that Big Tech has a blind spot about the severe limitations of large language models. https://www.technologyreview.com/ ...
@ylecun Unless you forgot your own Twit. To clarify, it was not capable of doing this. https://twitter.com/...
MIT Technology Review
Meta AI and Papers with Code pull Galactica three days after launch, amid criticism the large language model for generating scientific text asserts falsehoods
and its hubris—show once again that Big Tech has a blind spot about the severe limitations of large language models. https://www.technologyreview.com/ ...