/
Navigation
C
Chronicles
Browse all articles
C
E
Explore
Semantic exploration
E
R
Research
Entity momentum
R
N
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
N
~
Story Arc
Topic evolution
S
↻
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
D
P
Posts
Analysis & commentary
P
Browse
@
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
◇
Domains
Browse by publication source
☉
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
?
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
!
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
+
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
*
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
vs
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
/\
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
!!
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Nav: C E R N
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
VOICE ARCHIVE

Brad Hill

@hillbrad
8 posts
2020-12-20
It's not that Apple requires developers to ask users if they consent to sharing data with 3rd parties. It's that Apple forbids developers from doing anything differently when users decline.
2020-12-20 View on X
New York Times

The only explanation for its ad campaign against Apple is that Facebook has decided shamelessness works, after years of cozying up to the Trump administration

For most of the past week and a half, this image has been stuck in my head: John Gruber / Daring Fireball : Facebook Wades Into Epic's Dispute With Apple Filipe Espósito / 9to5Mac ...

View original
Apple is just straight-up demanding that developers who monetize through the only meaningful channel that doesn't net them a 15-30% cut *must* offer users a free ride. And it really is a free ride in most cases.
2020-12-20 View on X
New York Times

The only explanation for its ad campaign against Apple is that Facebook has decided shamelessness works, after years of cozying up to the Trump administration

For most of the past week and a half, this image has been stuck in my head: John Gruber / Daring Fireball : Facebook Wades Into Epic's Dispute With Apple Filipe Espósito / 9to5Mac ...

View original
No, “Share your data to enable meaningful ads, or pay $15 to use this app,” no “Enable personalized advertising to unlock premium features,” not even, “You'll see more, less valuable, ads if you decline.” That would be user choice.
2020-12-20 View on X
New York Times

The only explanation for its ad campaign against Apple is that Facebook has decided shamelessness works, after years of cozying up to the Trump administration

For most of the past week and a half, this image has been stuck in my head: John Gruber / Daring Fireball : Facebook Wades Into Epic's Dispute With Apple Filipe Espósito / 9to5Mac ...

View original
I shouldn't be surprised anymore but it is amazing that none of the press coverage I've read of Apple's iOS 14 changes re: advertising have managed to mention *at all* the single most salient fact of the situation. https://www.nytimes.com/...
2020-12-20 View on X
New York Times

The only explanation for its ad campaign against Apple is that Facebook has decided shamelessness works, after years of cozying up to the Trump administration

For most of the past week and a half, this image has been stuck in my head: John Gruber / Daring Fireball : Facebook Wades Into Epic's Dispute With Apple Filipe Espósito / 9to5Mac ...

View original
2020-12-19
It's not that Apple requires developers to ask users if they consent to sharing data with 3rd parties. It's that Apple forbids developers from doing anything differently when users decline.
2020-12-19 View on X
New York Times

The only explanation for its ad campaign against Apple is that Facebook has decided shamelessness works, after years of cozying up to the Trump administration

The company declared in newspaper ads that it was “standing up to Apple.”  It's a desperate ploy that's unlikely to work.

View original
No, “Share your data to enable meaningful ads, or pay $15 to use this app,” no “Enable personalized advertising to unlock premium features,” not even, “You'll see more, less valuable, ads if you decline.” That would be user choice.
2020-12-19 View on X
New York Times

The only explanation for its ad campaign against Apple is that Facebook has decided shamelessness works, after years of cozying up to the Trump administration

The company declared in newspaper ads that it was “standing up to Apple.”  It's a desperate ploy that's unlikely to work.

View original
Apple is just straight-up demanding that developers who monetize through the only meaningful channel that doesn't net them a 15-30% cut *must* offer users a free ride. And it really is a free ride in most cases.
2020-12-19 View on X
New York Times

The only explanation for its ad campaign against Apple is that Facebook has decided shamelessness works, after years of cozying up to the Trump administration

The company declared in newspaper ads that it was “standing up to Apple.”  It's a desperate ploy that's unlikely to work.

View original
I shouldn't be surprised anymore but it is amazing that none of the press coverage I've read of Apple's iOS 14 changes re: advertising have managed to mention *at all* the single most salient fact of the situation. https://www.nytimes.com/...
2020-12-19 View on X
New York Times

The only explanation for its ad campaign against Apple is that Facebook has decided shamelessness works, after years of cozying up to the Trump administration

The company declared in newspaper ads that it was “standing up to Apple.”  It's a desperate ploy that's unlikely to work.

View original