/
Navigation
C
Chronicles
Browse all articles
C
E
Explore
Semantic exploration
E
R
Research
Entity momentum
R
N
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
N
~
Story Arc
Topic evolution
S
↻
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
D
P
Posts
Analysis & commentary
P
Browse
@
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
◇
Domains
Browse by publication source
☉
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
?
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
!
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
+
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
*
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
vs
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
/\
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
!!
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Nav: C E R N
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
VOICE ARCHIVE

Andy Guess

@andyguess
11 posts
2023-07-29
It's interesting to note the disconnect between the relatively powerful effects we document in terms of platform experiences and behavior, and the downstream outcomes focused on knowledge, attitudes, and off-platform behavior. 15/
2023-07-29 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

Ekeoma E. Uzogara Authors Info & Affiliations  —  pp.  386-387 Washington Post : Changing Facebook's algorithm won't fix polarization, new study finds Science : How do social media...

View original
Even with the existing algorithm, the baseline proportions are quite low: In the default feed, the average share of users' feeds in our sample containing posts from untrustworthy sources was 2.6% on FB; for uncivil posts, 3.2%; for slur words: .03%. And even less on IG. 11/
2023-07-29 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

Ekeoma E. Uzogara Authors Info & Affiliations  —  pp.  386-387 Washington Post : Changing Facebook's algorithm won't fix polarization, new study finds Science : How do social media...

View original
TL;DR: We pre-registered, outside researchers had final say, and Meta committed not to block the publication of findings they didn't like (they kept their promise). Both Meta and the outside academic research team took user privacy very seriously. 5/
2023-07-29 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

Ekeoma E. Uzogara Authors Info & Affiliations  —  pp.  386-387 Washington Post : Changing Facebook's algorithm won't fix polarization, new study finds Science : How do social media...

View original
What did we find? 1. ENGAGEMENT: The chrono feed decreased the time users spent on the platforms (by about 20% on FB and 11% on IG). Engagement on the platforms also went down. 8/ [image]
2023-07-29 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

Ekeoma E. Uzogara Authors Info & Affiliations  —  pp.  386-387 Washington Post : Changing Facebook's algorithm won't fix polarization, new study finds Science : How do social media...

View original
Today is publication day for the first 4 papers resulting from a unique collaboration between Meta researchers and outside academics to study the political effects of Facebook and Instagram in the 2020 U.S. election! 🧵 1/N
2023-07-29 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

Ekeoma E. Uzogara Authors Info & Affiliations  —  pp.  386-387 Washington Post : Changing Facebook's algorithm won't fix polarization, new study finds Science : How do social media...

View original
2023-07-28
Today is publication day for the first 4 papers resulting from a unique collaboration between Meta researchers and outside academics to study the political effects of Facebook and Instagram in the 2020 U.S. election! 🧵 1/N
2023-07-28 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

In four new studies, researchers found complicated results from experiments on Facebook's and Instagram's algorithms …

View original
It's interesting to note the disconnect between the relatively powerful effects we document in terms of platform experiences and behavior, and the downstream outcomes focused on knowledge, attitudes, and off-platform behavior. 15/
2023-07-28 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

In four new studies, researchers found complicated results from experiments on Facebook's and Instagram's algorithms …

View original
Even with the existing algorithm, the baseline proportions are quite low: In the default feed, the average share of users' feeds in our sample containing posts from untrustworthy sources was 2.6% on FB; for uncivil posts, 3.2%; for slur words: .03%. And even less on IG. 11/
2023-07-28 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

In four new studies, researchers found complicated results from experiments on Facebook's and Instagram's algorithms …

View original
TL;DR: We pre-registered, outside researchers had final say, and Meta committed not to block the publication of findings they didn't like (they kept their promise). Both Meta and the outside academic research team took user privacy very seriously. 5/
2023-07-28 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

In four new studies, researchers found complicated results from experiments on Facebook's and Instagram's algorithms …

View original
What did we find? 1. ENGAGEMENT: The chrono feed decreased the time users spent on the platforms (by about 20% on FB and 11% on IG). Engagement on the platforms also went down. 8/ [image]
2023-07-28 View on X
New York Times

In four new studies with collaboration from Meta, researchers find Facebook's algorithm is “influential” but doesn't necessarily change beliefs, and more

In four new studies, researchers found complicated results from experiments on Facebook's and Instagram's algorithms …

View original
2019-08-28
.@SocSciOne is apparently on life support. Funders have set a Sept. 30 deadline for promised URL shares data from Facebook. See announcement from @ssrc_org below. https://www.ssrc.org/... https://twitter.com/...
2019-08-28 View on X
The Social Science Research Council

Unless Facebook delivers promised data to researchers by Sept. 30, consortium of funders will recommend Social Science Research Council wind down the project

The Social Science Research Council :

View original