2025-11-30
Good news: this tool detects all my ICLR reviews as fully-human written. Bad news: a lot of reviews on the papers in my stack are fully AI generated (including one in which mine is the only one detected as human-written!).
Nature
Pangram Labs: ~21% of the 75,800 peer reviews submitted for ICLR 2026, a major ML conference, were fully AI-generated, and 50%+ contained signs of AI use
By - Miryam Naddaf 0 — Miryam Naddaf is a science writer based in London. — Search author on: — PubMed Google Scholar
2025-11-29
Good news: this tool detects all my ICLR reviews as fully-human written. Bad news: a lot of reviews on the papers in my stack are fully AI generated (including one in which mine is the only one detected as human-written!).
Nature
Pangram Labs: ~21% of the 75,800 peer reviews submitted for ICLR 2026, a major ML conference, were fully AI-generated, and 50%+ contained signs of AI use
By - Miryam Naddaf 0 — Miryam Naddaf is a science writer based in London. — Search author on: — PubMed Google Scholar