/
Navigation
C
Chronicles
Browse all articles
C
E
Explore
Semantic exploration
E
R
Research
Entity momentum
R
N
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
N
~
Story Arc
Topic evolution
S
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
D
P
Posts
Analysis & commentary
P
Browse
@
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
?
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
!
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
+
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
*
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
vs
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
/\
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
!!
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Nav: C E R N
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Despite the focus on generative AI misinformation, policy discourse ignores that politicians pose the gravest misinformation threat, ahead of big 2024 elections

As we head into a big election year, beware the risks of misleading statements from those at very top X: @fascinatorfun , @jpeterburger , @prateekwaghre , @katray , @rasmus_kleis , @risj_oxford , @acerbialberto , @nivincent , @mr_james_c , @jburnmurdoch , @1br0wn , @jason_kint , and @whotargetsme . LinkedIn: Lars Boering X: @fascinatorfun : “In the US, the Washington Post stopped counting after documenting at least 30,573 false or misleading claims made by Donald Trump as president. In the UK, the non-profit FullFact has reported that as many as 50 MPs — including 2 PMs, cabinet ministers & shadow cabinet ministers Peter Burger / @jpeterburger : ‘Of course there will be examples of AI-generated misinformation, bots, and deepfakes during various elections next year. But the key question is how politicians will be using these tools.’ Prateek Waghre / @prateekwaghre : As someone who has followed @rasmus_kleis ‘misinformation comes from the top exhibit ♾️’ tweets for years, thrilled to see this piece. You can also count on the him to direct our attention to where we should be focusing (i.e. the role of political actors in this case). For... Kathryn Raymundo / @katray : Perhaps, DIS/MALinfo & influence operations — usually deliberate & systematic. “...misinformation coming from the top is likely to have a far greater impact than that from most other sources, whether social media posts by ordinary people, hostile actors, or commercial scammers.” Rasmus Kleis Nielsen / @rasmus_kleis : “When it comes to the most serious misinformation, the calls tend to come from inside the house. Technology will not change that, so let's stop gaslighting the public and admit clearly [that] misinformation often comes from the top” Wrote this for the @FT https://giftarticle.ft.com/... @risj_oxford : “Discussions remain bogged down with how to police AI content, while distracting us from how politicians are pushing for legal exemptions from content moderation” Our own @rasmus_kleis at @FT on why politicians pose the gravest misinformation threat https://www.ft.com/... Alberto Acerbi / @acerbialberto : “When it comes to the most serious misinformation, the calls tend to come from inside the house. Technology will not change that, so let's stop gaslighting the public and admit clearly [...] that misinformation often comes from the top.” https://www.ft.com/... Vincent Ni / @nivincent : “Academic findings repeatedly underline the actual impact of politics, while policy documents focus persistently on the possible impact of new technologies,” Read this piece by @rasmus_kleis https://www.ft.com/... @mr_james_c : Oh it goes *waaay* deeper than that. [image] John Burn-Murdoch / @jburnmurdoch : Great piece from @rasmus_kleis on the poor quality and ironically often misleading nature of discourse around misinformation. Report after report warns about deepfakes and AI bots, but there's virtually no mention of the most significant source of misinformation: politicians [image] Ian Brown / @1br0wn : “This is set to be a big election year... People will rightly be on their guard for #misinformation, but much of the policy discussion on the topic ignores the most important source: members of the political elite.” @rasmus_kleis https://www.ft.com/... Jason Kint / @jason_kint : Reasonable take but would encourage not to bifurcate this way. AYK, the misinformation has always existed. The velocity and micro targeted reach of social media combined with its suppression of counterspeech is new and material here. And we're less prepared after the last year. @whotargetsme : Excellent from @rasmus_kleis. Focus less on tech/AI/misinfo/foreign influence. Instead, follow the politicians, what they say, who they say it to and how much they spend to say it. https://www.ft.com/... LinkedIn: Lars Boering : A spot on article by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen: misinformation often comes from members of the political elite.  —  Quote:  —  'We know this from years of research. …

Financial Times